Institutional Affiliation

Terrorism inside our borders was non something that people thought of daily if ever. radio set advertisements that instructed us on how to talk to our children ab pop terrorist claps, as though it were similar to a tornado warning, is non something that I anticipated in my lifetime. The atrocity that occurred on 9/11 is not something that is supposed to observe here, but it did. We ar ch all in allenged by the infiltration of immigrants to our rural atomic number 18a, whether healthy or illegal. Our citizens are fearful of the future attacks that are threatened and at times the very carriage of the Arab population deep d experience our communities.Inter commonwealthal terrorism threatens the unify States, its allies, and the instauration community. Defeating the terrorist enemy requires sound policies, united governance effort, and worldwide cooperation. In light of that, it is difficult to consider as you board an airplane with six Arab passengers, that we live in the melting pot. America was founded on freedoms, freedom of public lecture and freedom of religion, to name a few. How do we, as a earth, admonisher and measure our safety, while ensuring the freedoms that are afforded our citizens? How do we deal with the threat of terrorism deep down our own borders?Can we provide safety by simply following the laws of our country? As a senior counter-terrorism official, it is my responsibility to ensure the safety of our communities. topical anaesthetic law enforcement plays a critical role in enhancing the safety in communities. Communication links amongst local law enforcement and accede and federal government will further the effectiveness of this program. It will be my responsibility to encourage local law enforcement in their fight a get intost terrorism. We do not cook the chastise to intrude on the religious activities of Arabs or anyone else within our communities without respectable cause.Defining terrorism in a country based on freedoms is a difficult task. Our countrys downfall is we stick still not attempted to deal with or identify the causes of terrorism. We mustiness identify the cause and the potential activities which threaten our society. The conundrum of terrorismthe problem of a relatively slender number of violent lawbreakers who have set out to undermine our representative way of life and strain either to blackmail the government through force play or the threat of violence to comply with their demands, or to overthrow the government entirely. We should all think close what kind of country we want to live in.To be truly patriotic means recognizing our responsibilities to uphold the democratic principles which make this the freest nation on Earth. It is important to remember that the opening words of the Constitution are We the People not I the People. Being a citizen in a democracy means that you cant organize your own snobby army because you disagree with the actions of the democ ratically elected government. We hire to focus on restorative legal expert. Restorative referee is grounded in the focus on the maltreat created, not simply on the breach of law. This means that the prototypal priority isunderstanding and responding to the needs of victims and the healing of victims. The direct victims are the primary focus, but everyone else who has been touched by the abomination is also involved, including the community as a whole. To handle the terms to victims, restorative justice believes that we must adduce moral responsibility and the need for account qualification on the part of those who have done the harm. Restorative justice sees the past in the context of the present and the future, looking at * what accountability is required to address the harm to the victims * what accountability would provide the offender the opportunity to dorestitution or reparation or whatever needs to be done to address the harm created and * what accountability is ne eded for the restoration of community, including the restoration of the victim and the offender into community. such accountability assumes the need for safety. This involves the whole community winning responsibility for the victims as well up as the offender, including perceive everyone in a human context that is broader than just the moment of the crime. Finally, restorative justice is about the amour of all parties, including the larger community, in working towards healingthe harm and the creation of community, a community that includes both the victims and the offenders. at bottom our communities, it is critical that we appropriately monitor the business of individuals who have been associated or are believed to be associated with cognize terrorists. in that location are already procedures in place to monitor the actions of these individuals. It would not be appropriate to infiltrate communities on the basis of race, unless there are specific ties to known terrorists. Ethically, homeland security is responsible for the safety of all individuals within ourborders and cannot pick and choose based on race. Known terrorists, whether American born or a foreign national, once captured should all receive the equivalent treatment and rights. Recent actions of military in Iraq and elsewhere, if construe by the Iraki people, may give evolve to the belief that Americans are in fact the terrorists. The torment of Iraqi captives and the outright murder of innocent Iraqi civilians could lead one to believe that we are no better than Al Queda. We do not have the right to torture terrorists in order to gain information. Effective counterterrorism should take the form of pr as yettion.We need to offset the terrorist organization by weakening it or do potential targets more difficult to attack. After the attacks of 9/11, an important distinction was drawn between the U. S. principle that an attack on Afghan soil was true(a) because of the Talibans close a nd supportive relationship with al foot and the more extended claim, that one nation could first appearance an attack within another nations sovereign territory, even if there was no state support for terrorists performing within the borders.If evidence is present that a extra state has intentionally supported global terrorism and continues to do so, the case can be make for armed force to avoid future terrorist attacks within the framework of the just war tradition. A state linked to support of terrorism against another nation is engaged in a war of aggression. any country that is the object of terrorist attacks has a right to bear itself. In effect, the case against the Taliban was not intervention for government change but a war of self-protection against a government that was directly complicit in terrorist attacks. (Himes, 2004) The attack on Iraq does not meet the criteria of Just War.President provide and his advisors presented a case for armed intervention in order t o stop the proliferation of weapons of mass destruction. Concern that enemies top executive use such weapons has fueled the new debate. The United States declared its willingness to initiate attacks upon adversaries it considers to be threatening. Anti-Americanism is alive and well in all parts of the world. Within our own borders, Anti-Americanism is not as widespread as is the disenchantment with our own government. It is not the foundations of America that are at issue, but the interpretation and thus application of our ability to affect the rest of the world.